It took me years and
years to realise that I wasn’t going to master Latin. An appalling language. For
instance, the subject moves around the sentence and you have to track it down which
means you have to recognise it. Since it has a different form in each of the
six declensions, to say nothing of the sub-forms of the third, the task feels
insuperable, at least to me.
I’m not saying I didn’t get anywhere with it. In the
eighteenth century, German or Nordic scientists, aware that no-one was ever
going to learn to read their languages, used to write in Latin. In fact, at the
time, not many could cope with English – Voltaire was exceptional in mastering it,
since most of his compatriots couldn’t even be bothered to try, a tradition
proudly kept alive by their descendants to this day. Even so, though English scientists
also wrote Latin (viz Newton’s Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica) they
would occasionally stick to English (viz Newton’s Opticks with its interesting take on spelling).
It may have been that refusal of English-speakers to use an international language consistently that eventually forced the world
to adopt ours. Helped a bit by the power of the US dollar, of course. And not a
little by the power of the US bayonet.
Anyway, back in the
eighteenth century, much scientific material was in Latin. So when I was
working on eighteenth-century science I’d occasionally have to read Latin,
which was always a curious experience. I could usually work out that the author
was talking about planetary orbits, for instance, but couldn’t always tell whether he was
saying that they were elliptical or
that they weren’t. A little learning
can sometimes be a frustrating thing.
Ultimately I’ve had to accept defeat. Now my knowledge of the
language – until perhaps I get another chance to have a go in retirement
(assuming I get to retire some day) – really comes down to a few
half-remembered tags.
One of these is ‘Timeo Danaos et dona ferentes’, which seems
to be saying ‘I’m timid when confronted by Danes and iron women’ but I’m reliably
assured actually means ‘I fear the Greeks when they come bearing gifts.’
Well, last week was when the rest of Europe tried to make a
gift to the Greeks. Or was it perhaps the other way round?
First the Eurozone offered Greece a pile of money, but only
on condition it spent a lot less. Sounds like one of those ‘good news, bad news’
things, doesn’t it? ‘Have all this lovely money, just don’t use it.’ Then the
soon to be ex-Prime Minister said he’d have a referendum and ask his
compatriots whether they’d like a tad more austerity, reduced pensions and a
lot fewer jobs, because people usually say ‘yes’ when asked that.
My first reaction to the idea of holding a referendum was
one of horror. For God’s sake, I wanted to scream, there isn’t any other offer
on the table. What if the electorate says ‘no’? You think Merkel and Sarkozy
are going to say ‘well, in that case,
we’ll dip a bit further in our pockets and come up with some more?’
So the moment I heard he’d withdrawn the referendum promise –
or threat – I was relieved. But then I began to wonder. I mean, what if the
Greeks had said ‘no’? Maybe it’s time
someone did.
In a sense, that’s what the ‘Occupy’ protests are all about.
They’re not demanding anything in particular – more money spent on schools,
less on the military, or whatever. They’re saying ‘the way we’re going isn’t
right. Let’s check the direction of travel before we go any further.’
And they’re right. What’s being imposed on the Greeks is
just more of the same, which of course means a lot less. Less public health.
Less education. Less employment. While the elite who got Greece into this mess
in the first place will contrive to look sorry while hanging on to their loot. In Britain, bonuses in
the Finance sector fell from £14 billion in 2008 to £12 billion in 2009 – only to
go back to £14 billion in 2010. The pay of Chief Executives of our biggest
companies rose by 49% last year. Some people are doing just fine in this crisis,
mostly the ones who got us into the mess and then demanded we pay for it.
Those people in the tents around St Paul’s are saying that
there must be a better way.
I’d have feared it if the Greeks had brought us a gift
consisting of a ‘no’ in a referendum. But perhaps it would have been no bad thing to face that fear and deal with it.
Virgil's Aeneid warned us about the Greeks. I think. |
Postscript. It’s
not all bad news at the moment, is it? It looks like Berlusconi’s on his way
out. Of course, I won’t believe he’s gone till he’s actually been replaced – he
has a way, like the monster in a horror film, of re-emerging again and again
when you think the hero’s finally got him. But I guess we can at least start to
hope that this is, finally, the beginning of the end.
2 comments:
It's perhaps a sign of the onset of Stockholm syndrome, and a quibble not really germane to the bulk of your post, but I feel compelled to point out that for the most part, where bayonets were involved in the spread of English, they were held by British soldiers rather than American ones. After all, Americans barely speak English as it is.
An excellent couple of points - and of course you're specifically right that it was the British who brought the gift of the bayonet to the nations to which their civilising mission took them. With their tanks and their cruise missiles, I imagine that US armed forces would regard the bayonet as little more than an amusing reminder of bygone days.
Post a Comment