The same could be said of other apparent commitments. Brexit pledges for future prosperity, for instance. Or, indeed, Conservative election promises.
A glowing example of the latter is in Theresa May’s claim, in the Conservative election manifesto at the 2017 General Election in Britain, that she would deliver:
Fairer corporate governance, built on new rules for takeovers, executive pay and worker representation on company boards.
Top executives at |
Anyone who believes the top CEOs are working nearly three times as hard as their counterparts twenty years should probably stop reading this piece now.
Equally, anyone who thinks they’re worth the same as 129 of their staff has an inflated assessment of the job of a CEO. Generally, it consists of making a lot of money whether or not the company is doing well and, when it gets into trouble, leaving with a colossal payoff before stepping into another only slightly less grossly overpaid job.
The employees on 1/129 of his income will find themselves paid a few weeks’, or if they’re lucky a few months’, salary and then battle to get another job. Homes and families may well be sacrificed in the process.
The actual proposals that have now been made by Theresa May’s government are somewhat less ambitious than her initial words suggest.
Companies will be urged to appoint employee directors or advisory groups advising their boards. They will not be mandated to do so.
As for the gaping disparities in pay, the 900 biggest companies will be required to publish the ratio of top incomes to the average of the employees. This presumably is intended to “name and shame” the worst offenders. Sadly, I rather expect it to have the opposite effect.
For some time, police used Anti-Social Behaviour Orders against young people who routinely behaved badly. These days, “ASBOs” have been replaced by injunctions. One of the problems with these measures, is that they’ve come to be regarded by their recipients as badges of honour: you haven’t made it as a full-blown hooligan unless you have your injunction.
Can you imagine the conversations between leading CEOs on golf courses after the May proposals are enacted?
“We’ve had to publish our salary ratios,” says Gunther, “mine’s 135:1”.
“Really?” says Paul, “mine’s 151:1.”
“Wow,” replies Gunther, “I’ve got my work cut out for me.”
“You can say that again. I plan to push on to 170:1 by next year,” says Paul as he drives his ball off the tee into the bushes on the right of the fairway, “you’d better get moving.”
Oh, well. Such is life. Just further proof of the principle I started off with:
If you’re disappointed over a Tory promise, you have only youself to blame – for having believed it in the first place.
No comments:
Post a Comment