Boris Johnson now rules without parliamentary limits or even oversight on his power. And why? Because the British constitution, unwritten and dependent on politicians following convention, allows him too. A lesson for us all, if and when BoJo’s autocracy ends, that we have to stop regarding the unwritten constitution as a charming tradition, but at as a constant threat to democracy which we have to replace with something enforceable in law.
So where do we stand on day 2?
![]() |
“Parliament will consider this” petition against
its prorogation While it’s prorogued? |
Besides, the petition is to parliament. I’m not wholly clear how parliament can react to it while it’s prorogued. Aren’t we asking parliament to reverse a prorogation which it can’t until that prorogation ends?
In any case, BoJo won’t give a damn about the opposition he’s getting. He has plenty of support. Naturally, the right-wing press, the Telegraph, the Sun and the Mail prominent among them. Interestingly, they back the prorogation as a way to ensure that the will of the people is respected. In other words, that the Brexit referendum decision is carried out, even though no one voted for a hard Brexit and very few voters back one.
![]() |
The usual suspects support BoJo's assault on parliamentary democracy In the name of respecting a democratic decision, of course |
We suspend the central institution of our democracy in order to protect democratic rule? Only an autocrat and his supporters could come up with a paradox that bizarre.
Or that ugly.
No comments:
Post a Comment