The British government has spent a long time trying to hide the results of its own analysis of the potential economic outcomes of the different options for Brexit: leaving the EU but staying in the Single Market and Customs Union, leaving but with a good trade deal in place, or leaving with no deal and having to revert to World Trade Organisation terms ("hard Brexit). However, the government has been forced to release the reports to Parliament. The broad lines have begun to leak.
Those of us who voted to remain within the EU will not be at all surprised to discover that there is no option that is economically beneficial to the UK. The harder the Brexit, the worse the impact. And the regions most affected will be the North of England and to a somewhat lesser extent, the West Midlands.
Brexit damage to the UK economy by region From the Guardian |
It's easy to sympathise with Labour MPs, and indeed Labour Party members in those regions, who feel that opposing the Brexit views of so many constituents will undermine the party's position. It's particularly tough for the MPs, whose very jobs are at stake. So it's comprehensible that there should be calls to show understanding, even sympathy, for the anxiety about the EU expressed by so many in those regions.
This is often dressed up as an economic concern. EU immigrants are taking local jobs or putting excessive pressure on health, housing or education services. However, there is no evidence that any of this is happening and now there is evidence that Brexit would be no solution anyway - the government analysis shows that Brexit would wreak far worse damage on services and employment than immigrants ever could - if they did cause damage.
There is no valid economic argument for Brexit.
Which leads to the darker, uncomfortable truth about a lot of these Leave voters. A truth we don't like to voice inside Labour. Their concern about immigrants may not be about economics at all but simply about immigration.
What drives it is fear of the other, the foreigner - which is a translation of the original Greek that gives us the word xenophobia. It is the attitude summed up by Nigel Farage, leader of the UK Independence Party at the time of the Brexit referendum, when he spoke of his discomfort at finding himself in a railway carriage in which everyone around him was speaking a foreign language.
If "understanding" or "sympathy" means accommodating xenophobia, then Labour would be crossing a red line which lose it its soul.
Our supporters in the Brexit camp have swallowed a snake oil salesman's patter. They believed the now-discredited claims of the Brexiters that there would be a huge Brexit dividend that could be used to fund the NHS. They believed that many of their woes were caused by immigrants and leaving the EU would solve the problem. They believed it, and the latest leaks demonstrate again how mistaken they were.
Labour is the friend of these voters who are going to bear the brunt of the harm Brexit will do to Britain. It has a duty to speak truth to the Brexiters among them, explaining clearly how mistaken they were, not in a superior way, but just as one would attempt to prevent a friend signing away his money. We should be winning them round to what the evidence demonstrates: Brexit will solve none of their problems. And they need the chance to change their mind and exit from Brexit. Or at any rate, the chance to stay in the Customs Union, the least bad option of those on offer.
Instead the Labour leadership continues to sit on a fence. We're told the Brexit vote must be respected and no opportunity to revise that vote must be given. We hear claims, demonstrated to be entirely false by the example of Norway, that it isn't even possible to stay in the Single Market after leaving the EU. And we're told we have to go along with Leave sentiments, without interrogating ourselves as to whether those sentiments are simply based on economic misapprehension or on something far more toxic: downright xenophobia.
That doesn't feel like leadership. It feels like followership. And it's time Labour learned to lead once more.
Especially on the Brexit issue, the most urgent of our times, the one on which our friends most need our help.
2 comments:
The British people mandated the government to ‘have our cake and eat it’.
The problem is that all our friends and neighbours over the channel think that this is an absurd request and that it is somewhat insulting to even ask for it, so they will predictably refuse.
What does a government do when asked to fulfil an impossible mandate by its electorate? What a shame that we have given up on the representative democracy that enabled us to avoid these problems.
The paralysis that now besets all parts of government caught on the very sharp horns of this dilemma, is clearly damaging to all of us.
As a start, we need to stop listening to the people that promised us that ‘having our cake and eating it’ would not only be a great wheeze, but would be easy to deliver. They have done great damage to our standing in the world and our future economic prosperity.
Time to focus on building the bridges that we need in order to participate in a globalised world.
Well said, Steve. I'm sure you're right - it's often puzzled me what Brexiters were voting for, but having their cake and eating it feels like exactly what they were after.
Post a Comment